The Blues Guitarist
Learn Blues Guitar
Blues is a quintessential American musical style. It has its roots in the Deep South, and was originally a predominantly black musical form. Blues started distinguishing itself from the other musical styles in the early twentieth century, and has probably reached its peak sometime around the middle of that century. Today it’s considered a bit of a niche genre, but its musical progeny – particularly rock `n’ roll – are to this day the most important forms of musical entertainment.
This book covers most of the history of Blues, from its origins in the South to the many forms that it has acquired as musicians have moved all over the United States and as Blues became popular well beyond its provenance. The book highlights many famous Blues musicians and explains their particular styles and contributions. It also deals with the way that the history of Blues was affected by the evolution of the recording industry, and how the two had influenced each other. For the most of its history Blues has been strongly associated with the black culture, but it has enjoyed a significant amount of cross appeal. This book deals very frankly with the whole issue of race, but to its credit it doesn’t try to overexploit it or blow it out of proportion. It is a very interesting and satisfying account of the musical and cultural impact of one of the most prominent twentieth century musical genres.
The best way to fully appreciate the information that is presented in this book is by listening to the many artists and recordings that are mentioned herein. Some of the oldest ones are probably very hard to find, but I was able to listen to many others on one of the custom online radio stations. This helped me get the most out of reading this book.
Was this review helpful to you?
Anyone interested in the western world’s popular music should read all of Elijah Wald’s major books–this,Escaping the Delta: Robert Johnson and the Invention of the Blues, and How The Beatles Destroyed Rock ‘n’ Roll: An Alternative History of American Popular Music (hint: The latter is not in the least anti-Beatles). Wald is an enviously engaging writer, has the facts at his fingertips, and combines a deep, comprehensive love of his subject with a clearheaded, practical perspective on the questions of race, class, and history’s winners and losers. Read this–and the Robert Johnson book–before you read anything else about the blues, or read them as a corrective to more scattershot accounts. Wald’s readers might also get a small kick out of Crossroad Blues (Nick Travers Series).
The more I learn about the blues, the less I know, (at least in comparison to what I thought I knew before). Back in “the day”, (which for me was the mid-1970s up until the mid-1990s, my peak fan years); I was sure about many things. I wouldn’t have called myself a blues purist, that title would be relegated to acoustic fans who cursed the day Muddy Waters plugged in his guitar. (The same crowd hooted at Bob Dylan at the Newport Folk Festival in 1965.)I was quite happy with the roots image that the blues enjoyed, but I saw it as something more. It deserved to be appreciated in its own right. To this day, (and I still enjoy the music), I will rarely venture into acoustic land, (although I appreciate many aspects of it; like Robert Johnson). But back then in “ancient” times I was well aware of the thievery that went along with the blues business, (and the music business in general). I heard about Led Zeppelin settling out-of-court for `The Lemon Song’, (which was a rip-off of Howlin’ Wolf’s `Killing Floor’), and for `Whole Lotta Love’, (first covered by Muddy Waters and written by “Wee” Willie Dixon). There were many similar stories. Then some time passed. I became aware of an earlier version of a song, (1930), attributed to `Howlin’ Wolf, (`Sittin’ On Top Of The World’), by the Mississippi Sheiks. (Howlin’ Wolf published the song in 1957 under his real name, Chester Burnett). Then I recently read Buddy Guy’s latest book `When I Left Home’, where he describes the aforementioned Mr. Dixon helping himself to songwriting credits for something that Mr. Guy created.And then we have `The Blues: A Very Short Introduction’ by Elijah Wald. (And, a more recent tome called `How the Beatles Destroyed Rock `N’ Roll’, by the same author). Mr. Wald has done his homework. After finishing both books I can rightly say that I now doubt many previously held beliefs. Or, to put it a better way, I am now skeptical.I have to make something quite clear. This is not new in coming. It is the result of being exposed not only to the two aforementioned books; but to hundreds of album liners, articles, and books by other authors; and the music itself.I consider the blues to be the most important component in the American musical lexicon. But one thing is certain. It did not pop out of nowhere. It was the synthesis of many things, (chief among them the African-American experience). But nothing exists in a vacuum, and as Mr. Wald makes clear, “blues people” listened to, and played, everything. What exists from old 78 RPM recordings is only the tip of the iceberg. And, like today, artists are typecast, and are expected to follow the assigned script, (at least under a particular pseudonym, as musicians used different names for different record labels, and for different forms of music, if they were able to pull that off).The important thing to take away is that there will always be a certain amount of “borrowing” that goes on in the arts. Our efforts at copyright control are slipping, (especially in this information age, where everything is available with a click). And, when we find out that certain “ownerships” were stolen to begin with, what are we left with? The blues, (as defined by Mr. Wald), evolved by word-of-mouth, (or songs-by-mouth and instrument, if you will), in areas where the African-American participants would not have been given access to the legal machinery if they had wished to use it. (Efforts by African-American musicians and songwriters to obtain and enforce a copyright would have been met with scorn in many areas of the country during the original time of creation).So they shared openly with one another. One person’s verse would be slipped in, (improvisation-like), into another person’s song. Lines were made up on the spot in performance, (and on recordings), never to be used again. Musicians would play the same song again with differing, (but similar), lyrics. And down the road this big mixing bowl of music wound up in the public domain, (because of the lack of copyrighting). And that is when the trouble started, (as the slick ones incorporated that material into later “copyrighted” products). Confusing, isn’t it? (Now you know how I feel.)
You must be logged in to post a comment.